A Different Take on the SWOT Analysis

22 May, 2017
/ Comments Off on A Different Take on the SWOT Analysis

Most of us who have been in business for any length of time are familiar with the SWOT Analysis. Originated by Albert S. Humphrey in the 1960s, the SWOT is a useful tool for understanding a company’s Strengths and Weaknesses, and for identifying external Opportunities and Threats.  This tool has been used to develop organizational strategy, marketing strategy and even personal growth plans.

Over the years, I’ve led many teams through this same tool.  However, a few years ago, I was introduced to a different version of the SWOT by my colleagues at Five Capitals.  Let me show you how this works.

As you know, in a traditional SWOT, we list out internal Strengths and Weaknesses.  We also list out external Opportunities and Threats. Once those lists are completed, we then look for ways to leverage the Strengths and overcome Weaknesses. We also seek to capitalize on the Opportunities and avoid the Threats. In the Five Capitals version, we take those lists, and plot them along two axes of a matrix: a Strength-Weakness axis and an Opportunities-Threats axis. From there, we dig deeper to uncover the answers to four questions:

  1. Where are/can we see “Breakthrough”?
  2. Where are we experiencing “Battle”?
  3. Where are we experiencing “Frustration”?
  4. Where are we experiencing “Failure”

See the image below, and keep reading to see how to further probe these questions.

 

A Different Perspective

  • Breakthrough
    Whenever we can leverage our Strengths to take advantage of an Opportunity, Breakthrough occurs.  For example, an RFQ just came out (Opportunity), and our company is the only one that can meet the specification (Strength).  In this quadrant, we do 2 things: we celebrate the Breakthrough we are currently experiencing, and we identify and strategize how we can achieve more Breakthrough
  • Battle
    Whenever we can leverage our Strengths to avoid a threat, we find ourselves in a Battle. For example, our company has a patented technology that meets an RFQ requirement (Strength), but the competition is offering a lesser technology, claiming it meets the spec (Threat). In this quadrant, we strategize how to win the Battle.
  • Frustration
    Whenever we see an Opportunity, but our Weaknesses get in the way, that creates Frustration.  For example, a customer calls to say they have a project, and they want to give it your company (Opportunity). However, the project requires a service that you don’t offer directly, one you’ll have to outsource, which keeps you from being price competitive (Weakness).  In this quadrant, we strategize by seeking to use Opportunities to overcome our Weaknesses, thus reducing the level of Frustration.
  • Failure
    Whenever our Weakness keeps us from avoiding a Threat, we experience Failure. For example, a major customer announces that all vendors are required to meet 95% on time delivery (Threat). Your company meets on-time delivery at 90% (Weakness).  In this quadrant, we develop defensive strategies to mitigate the results of Failure.

Approaching the SWOT in this way provides a different perspective in developing organizational strategies. It allows you to wisely look at how best take advantage of opportunities and minimize the impact of outside threats.